Watts (chipotle) wrote,

But evenly-spaced margins are boring!

I've been hammering again on Why Coyotes Howl--at least on the typesetting test document I've been working on, which consists only of the title story, and the standard page size Sofawolf uses (5.25″ × 8″). I've found specs that I like for the book, and that meet a certain level of typographic beauty that I was looking for.

The thing is, I'm realizing it's a standard that most books don't aspire to, including professional ones. This isn't to say that they're doing bad jobs (some are, but most aren't), but rather that I'm obsessing over things like harmonious size between the text block and the overall page. Without getting any geekier than that statement reveals, what I mean is: evenly-spaced margins, like a half an inch on all sides, are boring. Designs which create vertically symmetric spreads (a "spread" being both left and right pages considered together, with the join point being the axis) but asymmetric pages look, well, better. If you get the ratios right--as much art as science--and the combination of that design with the number of lines on the page and the length of the lines, given the typeface size and leading you've chosen, the page also becomes easier to read.

The problem is that most good book designs like that end up with somewhat "luxurious" margins. This is out of fashion, because it's perceived as wasting paper. Of course, you'll see a lot of trade paperbacks compensate for that by having big print, 12-point instead of 10, and wide leading between lines--the typographer wants to get close to the traditional optimal number of letters/words per line. If your line is mandated to have quarter-inch margins, you end up trying to reach the optimal by making the type bigger.

At any rate, the upshot of all this is that I realize the design I'm fiddling with is one that--well--it doesn't waste space, because the white space is part of the design. But it's easy to perceive it as wasteful. Its outside and bottom margins are twice that of the inside and top, 1″ and ½″ respectively. You can find nonfiction books with "proper" margins like that pretty easily--but you can't find novels set that way too often, at least not paperbacks.

I'm playing around with a less "luxurious" margin setup, and have one that I don't... hate. It doesn't have the same look, though; it's a little more crowded, although still readable. (And it'll still be perceived as a little wasteful, I suspect.)

This is, of course, the downside to those books on good typography I've been reading...

  • A quick note

    Posts on Coyote Tracks are supposed to be cross-posted here, but it's clear the cross-poster isn't, er, posting. I apologize. I'll look into it,…

  • A better Amaretto Sour

    I’m pretty sure I was introduced to the amaretto sour in college by my roommate’s girlfriend. I liked it—because I like amaretto—but I…

  • Cotton, hay, and rags: giving bias the veneer of rationality

    As you’ve surely heard by now, a mid-level engineer at Google—he’s anonymous, so I’ll call him Mr. Rationalface—wrote a memo called…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 1 comment