May 30th, 2003

default, pepper

Fantagraphics and independent comics

At his weblog Unqualified Offerings, Jim Henley writes, "annoying but valuable indie comics publisher Fantagraphics is facing bankruptcy." And indeed, Fantagraphics writes about it on their front page.

I like Henley's phrasing, "annoying but valuable," which sums up most independent comics fans' relationship with Fantagraphics. Their flagship news title, The Comics Journal, alternates between brilliant insight and arrogant diatribe. Or least it did; I haven't read it in years. For the most part I haven't read comics in years, period.

Back in the late '80s and early '90s, I read a handful of titles, mostly "funny animal" books--which back then Fantagraphics championed with multipage advertisements for their line. Since then, they not only dropped them all, they've come across as faintly disdainful of the whole genre, as if they're slightly embarrassed to have published Captain Jack, Usagi Yojimbo (still alive and well at Dark Horse) or the long-running anthology title Critters. Fantagraphics is one of the last of the Great Independent Publishers from my collecting days--Eclipse, Kitchen Sink, Mirage, and Comico are long gone, and Warp Graphics has reverted to All Elves All The Time. For nostalgia's sake--if only that, honestly--it'd be a shame to see them die.

Even so, I wonder if the problem for the field on the whole (not Fantagraphics, whose financial woes are only partially their own doing) is due to net comics. Not solely the cute but fluffy ones like User Friendly, but the damn-that's-impressive ones like Nowhere Girl, which is clearly the kind of stuff Fantagraphics would have been doing a few years ago. I'm pretty skeptical of the whole "the web will replace print" meme, but there are obvious upsides to lowering the barrier of entry in publishing.
default, pepper

Writing secrets revealed!

By way of Patrick Nielsen Hayden's weblog, Electrolite: Novelist Jo Walton muses on deeper meanings behind... keyboard wear.

I pretend to be puzzled by this, but secretly I love it. Keyboard letters contain vital nutrients for my metabolism. They are where I get my ideas from, they keep my creativity flowing. They go in and out through my fingers and leave the keyboard burnished and empty.

It's clearly magic realism, because it ought to work like that. It's not in the least remarkable. One would only need to remark on it if it didn't happen.

(Interesting that my jaunt into the "blogosphere" has in fact redirected me back to LiveJournal. Also interesting to see the people commenting on that entry, and their friends-of-friends lists... there are more professional genre writers lurking on LJ than one might expect.)
default, pepper

"It pays to be unobjective" (a left-leaning, somewhat iconoclastic webzine) writes aboutthe popularity of "conservative" journalism as enumerated by Matt Labash, a senior writer with The Weekly Standard. In an interview with a journalism website, Labash blithely says, "We've created this cottage industry where it pays to be unobjective" at the same time as you "criticize other people for not being objective." (As an ironic footnote, I've found and The Weekly Standard to be about the most thoughtful "we wear our bias on our sleeve" sites from the left and right respectively. But TP's rant touches on an interesting topic about media biases, left and right: who is the liberal answer to Rupert Murdoch?)