Previous Entry | Next Entry

Huh.

default, pepper
So my last entry was June 11th and it begins, "I've been lax in updating this. Maybe I'll try to make this a weekly thing, but no promises."

Boy, good thing about the "no promise" part there, huh? Wow.

I'm trying to figure out when LiveJournal became--well--mostly irrelevant in my writing. In 2011 I've made only four posts, counting this one. In all of 2010, I made only 13; in 2009, 35; in 2008, 51; in 2007, 66; in 2006, 83. (Those numbers count "locked" updates, so not all of them will necessarily show up if you're bored enough to browse the archives.) In previous years I'm pretty sure I broke 100. I never used Facebook, but I think I started using Twitter as my main platform for small life updates around 2009, and in 2010 revived my "linkblog," Coyote Tracks, as a technology blog where most of my writing attention is going. While it's tiny potatoes by Big Name Blog standards, it has over 1,000 followers on Tumblr and 650 or so RSS subscribers.

I suspect at this point I should face the truth that I'm not likely to use this venue very much anymore. I don't even check my LJ "friends page" daily anymore, and I've never successfully integrated Dreamwidth, LJ's erstwhile replacement, into my browsing habits. While I appreciate the philosophy of DW's founders, in practice... well, in practice DW is where you start a blog as a quasi-political statement about how much you hated Six Apart or now hate SUP, and then cross-post to LiveJournal because you know the majority of your friends are still there. (I have exactly one friend who used to post on LJ, moved to DW and stopped cross-posting.) At this point I simply don't see DW achieving any kind of critical mass. I think that may be just fine for them; they've pretty much gone out of their way to target themselves to the copyright violation fan fiction community, and as long as they achieve critical mass there they'll be more than happy.

If not Dreamwidth, what does replace LJ? Personally, of course, I like Tumblr; I've seen it derided as "the dumber, naked LiveJournal," but I think that seriously underestimates how stupid a lot of LJs have historically been. Choosing a hosted blogging service by the apparent median IQ of the blogs hosted on them is going to leave you with Field Notes. Tumblr has the equivalent of a friends page, and you can choose to allow comments.

But the answer, more than likely, is "nothing." It's possible that the notion of a public journal that LiveJournal implicitly promotes is a notion that people are moving away from. Most people really don't want to share all of their life: they want to share general bits with everyone and specific bits with specific people. Some people want to just write rants; some people want to write daily or weekly columns, or to just share interesting things they've found around the net (or photos of things they've found in real life). Even though LJ was in many ways first with all that functionality, it's not really best at any of that functionality anymore. The people who can't handle having more than one site to do everything are mostly stuck in Facebook; for the rest of us, diffusing our attention across a few different places on the net turns out to be fairly easy.

Comments

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]haikujaguar wrote:
Sep. 6th, 2011 07:32 pm (UTC)
You disturb me! o_o
[info]tuftears wrote:
Sep. 6th, 2011 09:58 pm (UTC)
But I liked having one big place to catch up on all my friends' statements, whatever they wanted to chat about! D:
[info]chipotle wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2011 06:04 am (UTC)
I did, too. But LJ is not the place it once was, I suspect in large part because LJ still feels like the place it's always been and, well, we know the web can be less klunky than that these days. While Google+ could have moved into that spot, it looks like it's not going to really take off, at least with the crowd I follow. And while I've come to love Tumblr despite its quirks, I doubt I can convince a sufficient number of other people to love it. Perhaps Diaspora will get its act together.
[info]balinares wrote:
Sep. 6th, 2011 11:06 pm (UTC)
Bah, everybody leaving, one by one... :/
[info]chipotle wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2011 06:00 am (UTC)
I'm not leaving, but I'm admitting that it's not really the active place it used to be, either. :) Even when I'm explicitly trying to get discussions going here they often don't happen.
[info]balinares wrote:
Sep. 7th, 2011 11:53 am (UTC)
Yeah, well. I've also been under the impression that LJ is losing critical mass (for the lot of us who don't speak Russian anyway), and critical mass is the life or death of a social service.

This being said, the only reason I've not wholly migrated to DW yet is that I've not gotten around to migrating everything, so... I'll still keep up with LJ, of course. It's still the best way I've found to stay in touch with a whole array of friends, and this is of enormous value to me.
[info]greenreaper wrote:
Sep. 9th, 2011 05:38 am (UTC)
LiveJournal was great when it was non-trivial to setup a journal and provide easy ways for people to comment on it. If I were starting now, I'd probably make a separate blog with a tool like Drupal or Wordpress.

I'm more interested in commenting on other people's lives than my own, as I find it unlikely to be of interest to most people. :-)
[info]ben_mouse wrote:
Sep. 10th, 2011 12:56 am (UTC)
I think it depends on how one views LJ and it's uses. I've primarily kept the journal here for me. Having it viewed by others is a secondary function, very worthwhile yet not the main focus as to why I am here.
[info]chipotle wrote:
Sep. 10th, 2011 01:04 am (UTC)
That's perfectly reasonable. For my part, if I didn't expect people to be reading, I probably wouldn't be writing on LiveJournal, I think -- I'd be writing in a "local" journaling application, or just text files. I don't think it's that I write for an audience here most of the time, but rather that I write with the knowledge that this is effectively public space. I may have only a few dozen regular readers here, but unless an entry is friends-only, we all have several orders of magnitude more *potential* readers.
[info]aliasisudonomo wrote:
Sep. 12th, 2011 10:36 am (UTC)
I admit, I rarely use LJ in terms of writing, and as people have fallen off it's less useful reading - but then again, for someone who is studying computer science, I can be an awful stick in the mud where tech is concerned. :D

( 10 comments — Leave a comment )